Minutes:
John Wright, Senior Advisor, introduced the paper and draft response to the consultation. He outlined the key themes of the response:
· Support for collaboration between blue light services.
· Legislating a duty to collaborate could stifle innovation.
· Collaboration is best left at the local level.
· Governance changes are unnecessary.
· The consultation ignores the potential complexities associated with PCCs involvement in the governance of county FRAs
· Changes must have the support of local people and the government should not be able to overrule local decisions.
Members welcomed the draft response. There was a discussion during which members made a number of comments:
· The clause about PCCs making a hostile takeover of fire authorities should be removed from the proposals.
· The response is representative of the national picture and should not be framed in a way that makes it appear that all areas face some difficulties collaborating with the ambulance service. Most areas enjoy good collaborative relationships with their local ambulance trust.
· Integration with the local community is a fire service strength which other blue light services do not have.
· There should be clarity around who pays for the putting together of a business case.
· The fire service is good at collaborating with other services.
· The consultation only considers PCCs taking over FRAs and not vice versa.
· The strength of the fire brand allows the service to reach into places other emergency services cannot.
· Members disagreed that PCCs are more democratically representative than FRAs. They also felt that, because Police and Crime panels have no power over what a PCC does, local democratic control of the FRS would be lost in any transfer of governance.
· The fire service’s strength lies in community wellbeing.
· Any move towards establishing a single employer must be supported by both workforces before such a change takes place.
· Some of the strengths of the current system, peer challenge, and organisational experience could be lost if FRSs merged with police under the governance of the PCC.
· The consultation doesn’t address the savings that can be made from preventative work. The current health and wellbeing work undertaken by the FRS saves other services money.
Decision
· Members were unanimous that the proposed legislation was not required.
· Members agreed to forward individual fire authority responses to the consultation to the LGA.
Action
· Officers to make amendments to the draft response as per members’ comments.
· Officers to collate fire authority responses to the consultation on receipt
· Officers to forward the final LGA response to members of the Fire Commission.
Supporting documents: